RFC1778

RFC index | STD index | BCP index | FYI index
Plain text | gzipped plain text | A4 postscript | A4 postscript, 2 up | A4 postscript, 4 up








Network Working Group                                           T. Howes
Request for Comments: 1778                        University of Michigan
Obsoletes: 1488                                                 S. Kille
Category: Standards Track                               ISODE Consortium
                                                                W. Yeong
                                       Performance Systems International
                                                              C. Robbins
                                                              NeXor Ltd.
                                                              March 1995


        The String Representation of Standard Attribute Syntaxes

Status of this Memo

   This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
   Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
   improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
   Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
   and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Abstract

   The Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) [9] requires that
   the contents of AttributeValue fields in protocol elements be octet
   strings.  This document defines the requirements that must be
   satisfied by encoding rules used to render X.500 Directory attribute
   syntaxes into a form suitable for use in the LDAP, then goes on to
   define the encoding rules for the standard set of attribute syntaxes
   defined in [1,2] and [3].

1.  Attribute Syntax Encoding Requirements.

   This section defines general requirements for lightweight directory
   protocol attribute syntax encodings. All documents defining attribute
   syntax encodings for use by the lightweight directory protocols are
   expected to conform to these requirements.

   The encoding rules defined for a given attribute syntax must produce
   octet strings.  To the greatest extent possible, encoded octet
   strings should be usable in their native encoded form for display
   purposes. In particular, encoding rules for attribute syntaxes
   defining non-binary values should produce strings that can be
   displayed with little or no translation by clients implementing the
   lightweight directory protocols.






Howes, Kille, Yeong & Robbins                                   [Page 1]


RFC 1778                    Syntax Encoding                   March 1995


2.  Standard Attribute Syntax Encodings

   For the purposes of defining the encoding rules for the standard
   attribute syntaxes, the following auxiliary BNF definitions will be
   used:

     <a> ::= 'a' | 'b' | 'c' | 'd' | 'e' | 'f' | 'g' | 'h' | 'i' |
             'j' | 'k' | 'l' | 'm' | 'n' | 'o' | 'p' | 'q' | 'r' |
             's' | 't' | 'u' | 'v' | 'w' | 'x' | 'y' | 'z' | 'A' |
             'B' | 'C' | 'D' | 'E' | 'F' | 'G' | 'H' | 'I' | 'J' |
             'K' | 'L' | 'M' | 'N' | 'O' | 'P' | 'Q' | 'R' | 'S' |
             'T' | 'U' | 'V' | 'W' | 'X' | 'Y' | 'Z'

     <d> ::= '0' | '1' | '2' | '3' | '4' | '5' | '6' | '7' | '8' | '9'

     <hex-digit> ::= <d> | 'a' | 'b' | 'c' | 'd' | 'e' | 'f' |
                      'A' | 'B' | 'C' | 'D' | 'E' | 'F'

     <k> ::= <a> | <d> | '-'

     <p> ::= <a> | <d> | ''' | '(' | ')' | '+' | ',' | '-' | '.' |
             '/' | ':' | '?' | ' '

     <CRLF> ::= The ASCII newline character with hexadecimal value 0x0A

     <letterstring> ::= <a> | <a> <letterstring>

     <numericstring> ::= <d> | <d> <numericstring>

     <keystring> ::= <a> | <a> <anhstring>

     <anhstring> ::= <k> | <k> <anhstring>

     <printablestring> ::= <p> | <p> <printablestring>

     <space> ::= ' ' | ' ' <space>

2.1.  Undefined

   Values of type Undefined are encoded as if they were values of type
   Octet String, with the string value being the BER-encoded version of
   the value.

2.2.  Case Ignore String

   A string of type caseIgnoreStringSyntax is encoded as the string
   value itself.




Howes, Kille, Yeong & Robbins                                   [Page 2]


RFC 1778                    Syntax Encoding                   March 1995


2.3.  Case Exact String

   The encoding of a string of type caseExactStringSyntax is the string
   value itself.

2.4.  Printable String

   The encoding of a string of type printableStringSyntax is the string
   value itself.

2.5.  Numeric String

   The encoding of a string of type numericStringSyntax is the string
   value itself.

2.6.  Octet String

   The encoding of a string of type octetStringSyntax is the string
   value itself.

2.7.  Case Ignore IA5 String

   The encoding of a string of type caseIgnoreIA5String is the string
   value itself.

2.8.  IA5 String

   The encoding of a string of type iA5StringSyntax is the string value
   itself.

2.9.  T61 String

   The encoding of a string of type t61StringSyntax is the string value
   itself.

2.10.  Case Ignore List

   Values of type caseIgnoreListSyntax are encoded according to the
   following BNF:

<caseignorelist> ::= <caseignorestring> |
                     <caseignorestring> '$' <caseignorelist>

<caseignorestring> ::= a string encoded according to the rules for Case
                       Ignore String as above.






Howes, Kille, Yeong & Robbins                                   [Page 3]


RFC 1778                    Syntax Encoding                   March 1995


2.11.  Case Exact List

   Values of type caseExactListSyntax are encoded according to the
   following BNF:

<caseexactlist> ::= <caseexactstring> |
                     <caseexactstring> '$' <caseexactlist>

<caseexactstring> ::= a string encoded according to the rules for Case
                      Exact String as above.

2.12.  Distinguished Name

   Values of type distinguishedNameSyntax are encoded to have the
   representation defined in [5].

2.13.  Boolean

   Values of type booleanSyntax are encoded according to the following
   BNF:

     <boolean> ::= "TRUE" | "FALSE"

   Boolean values have an encoding of "TRUE" if they are logically true,
   and have an encoding of "FALSE" otherwise.

2.14.  Integer

   Values of type integerSyntax are encoded as the decimal
   representation of their values, with each decimal digit represented
   by the its character equivalent. So the digit 1 is represented by the
   character

2.15.  Object Identifier

   Values of type objectIdentifierSyntax are encoded according to the
   following BNF:

     <oid> ::= <descr> | <descr> '.' <numericoid> | <numericoid>

     <descr> ::= <keystring>

     <numericoid> ::= <numericstring> | <numericstring> '.' <numericoid>

   In the above BNF, <descr> is the syntactic representation of an
   object descriptor. When encoding values of type
   objectIdentifierSyntax, the first encoding option should be used in
   preference to the second, which should be used in preference to the



Howes, Kille, Yeong & Robbins                                   [Page 4]


RFC 1778                    Syntax Encoding                   March 1995


   third wherever possible. That is, in encoding object identifiers,
   object descriptors (where assigned and known by the implementation)
   should be used in preference to numeric oids to the greatest extent
   possible. For example, in encoding the object identifier representing
   an organizationName, the descriptor "organizationName" is preferable
   to "ds.4.10", which is in turn preferable to the string "2.5.4.10".

2.16.  Telephone Number

   Values of type telephoneNumberSyntax are encoded as if they were
   Printable String types.

2.17.  Telex Number

   Values of type telexNumberSyntax are encoded according to the
   following BNF:

     <telex-number> ::= <actual-number> '$' <country> '$' <answerback>

     <actual-number> ::= <printablestring>

     <country> ::= <printablestring>

     <answerback> ::= <printablestring>

   In the above, <actual-number> is the syntactic representation of the
   number portion of the TELEX number being encoded, <country> is the
   TELEX country code, and <answerback> is the answerback code of a
   TELEX terminal.

2.18.  Teletex Terminal Identifier

   Values of type teletexTerminalIdentifier are encoded according to the
   following BNF:

     <teletex-id> ::= <printablestring>  0*('$' <ttx-parm>)

     <ttx-param> ::= <ttx-key> ':' <ttx-value>

     <ttx-key> ::= 'graphic' | 'control' | 'misc' | 'page' | 'private'

     <ttx-value> ::= <octetstring>

   In the above, the first <printablestring> is the encoding of the
   first portion of the teletex terminal identifier to be encoded, and
   the subsequent 0 or more <printablestrings> are subsequent portions
   of the teletex terminal identifier.




Howes, Kille, Yeong & Robbins                                   [Page 5]


RFC 1778                    Syntax Encoding                   March 1995


2.19.  Facsimile Telephone Number

   Values of type FacsimileTelephoneNumber are encoded according to the
   following BNF:

<fax-number> ::= <printablestring> [ '$' <faxparameters> ]

<faxparameters> ::= <faxparm> | <faxparm> '$' <faxparameters>

<faxparm> ::= 'twoDimensional' | 'fineResolution' | 'unlimitedLength' |
              'b4Length' | 'a3Width' | 'b4Width' | 'uncompressed'

   In the above, the first <printablestring> is the actual fax number,
   and the <faxparm> tokens represent fax parameters.

2.20.  Presentation Address

   Values of type PresentationAddress are encoded to have the
   representation described in [6].

2.21.  UTC Time

   Values of type uTCTimeSyntax are encoded as if they were Printable
   Strings with the strings containing a UTCTime value.

2.22.  Guide (search guide)

   Values of type Guide, such as values of the searchGuide attribute,
   are encoded according to the following BNF:

<guide-value> ::= [ <object-class> '#' ] <criteria>

<object-class> ::= an encoded value of type objectIdentifierSyntax

<criteria> ::= <criteria-item> | <criteria-set> | '!' <criteria>

<criteria-set> ::= [ '(' ] <criteria> '&' <criteria-set> [ ')' ] |
                   [ '(' ] <criteria> '|' <criteria-set> [ ')' ]

<criteria-item> ::= [ '(' ] <attributetype> '$' <match-type> [ ')' ]

<match-type> ::= "EQ" | "SUBSTR" | "GE" | "LE" | "APPROX"









Howes, Kille, Yeong & Robbins                                   [Page 6]


RFC 1778                    Syntax Encoding                   March 1995


2.23.  Postal Address

   Values of type PostalAddress are encoded according to the following
   BNF:

     <postal-address> ::= <t61string> | <t61string> '$' <postal-address>

   In the above, each <t61string> component of a postal address value is
   encoded as a value of type t61StringSyntax.

2.24.  User Password

   Values of type userPasswordSyntax are encoded as if they were of type
   octetStringSyntax.

2.25.  User Certificate

   Values of type userCertificate are encoded according to the following
   BNF:

     <certificate> ::= <version> '#' <serial> '#' <signature-algorithm-id>
                     '#' <issuer> '#' <validity> '#' <subject>
                     '#' <public-key-info> '#' <encrypted-sign-value>

     <version> ::= <integervalue>

     <serial> ::= <integervalue>

     <signature-algorithm-id> ::= <algorithm-id>

     <issuer> ::= an encoded Distinguished Name

     <validity> ::= <not-before-time> '#' <not-after-time>

     <not-before-time> ::= <utc-time>

     <not-after-time> ::= <utc-time>

     <algorithm-parameters> ::=  <null> | <integervalue> |
                                 '{ASN}' <hex-string>

     <subject> ::= an encoded Distinguished Name

     <public-key-info> ::= <algorithm-id> '#' <encrypted-sign-value>

     <encrypted-sign-value> ::= <hex-string> | <hex-string> '-' <d>

     <algorithm-id> ::= <oid> '#' <algorithm-parameters>



Howes, Kille, Yeong & Robbins                                   [Page 7]


RFC 1778                    Syntax Encoding                   March 1995


     <utc-time> ::= an encoded UTCTime value

     <hex-string> ::= <hex-digit> | <hex-digit> <hex-string>

2.26.  CA Certificate

   Values of type cACertificate are encoded as if the values were of
   type userCertificate.

2.27.  Authority Revocation List

   Values of type authorityRevocationList are encoded according to the
   following BNF:

<certificate-list> ::= <signature-algorithm-id> '#' <issuer> '#' <utc-time>
                        [ '#' <revoked-certificates> ]
                        '#' <signature-algorithm-id>
                        '#' <encrypted-sign-value>

<revoked-certificates> ::= 1*( '#' <revoked-certificate> )
                        <signature-algorithm-id> '#' <encrypted-sign-value>

<revoked-certificate> ::= <signature-algorithm-id> '#' <issuer> '#'
                        <serial> '#' <utc-time>

   The syntactic components <signature-algorithm-id>, <issuer>,
   <encrypted-sign-value>, <utc-time>, <subject> and <serial> have the
   same definitions as in the BNF for the userCertificate attribute
   syntax.

2.28.  Certificate Revocation List

   Values of type certificateRevocationList are encoded as if the values
   were of type authorityRevocationList.

2.29.  Cross Certificate Pair

   Values of type crossCertificatePair are encoded according to the
   following BNF:

     <certificate-pair> ::= <forward> '#' <reverse>
                             | <forward>
                             | <reverse>

     <forward> ::= 'forward:' <certificate>

     <reverse> ::= 'reverse:' <certificate>




Howes, Kille, Yeong & Robbins                                   [Page 8]


RFC 1778                    Syntax Encoding                   March 1995


   The syntactic component <certificate> has the same definition as in
   the BNF for the userCertificate attribute syntax.

2.30.  Delivery Method

   Values of type deliveryMethod are encoded according to the following
   BNF:

     <delivery-value> ::= <pdm> | <pdm> '$' <delivery-value>

     <pdm> ::= 'any' | 'mhs' | 'physical' | 'telex' | 'teletex' |
               'g3fax' | 'g4fax' | 'ia5' | 'videotex' | 'telephone'

2.31.  Other Mailbox

   Values of the type otherMailboxSyntax are encoded according to the
   following BNF:

     <otherMailbox> ::= <mailbox-type> '$' <mailbox>

     <mailbox-type> ::= an encoded Printable String

     <mailbox> ::= an encoded IA5 String

   In the above, <mailbox-type> represents the type of mail system in
   which the mailbox resides, for example "Internet" or "MCIMail"; and
   <mailbox> is the actual mailbox in the mail system defined by
   <mailbox-type>.

2.32.  Mail Preference

   Values of type mailPreferenceOption are encoded according to the
   following BNF:

     <mail-preference> ::= "NO-LISTS" | "ANY-LIST" | "PROFESSIONAL-LISTS"

2.33.  MHS OR Address

   Values of type MHS OR Address are encoded as strings, according to
   the format defined in [10].











Howes, Kille, Yeong & Robbins                                   [Page 9]


RFC 1778                    Syntax Encoding                   March 1995


2.34.  Distribution List Submit Permission

   Values of type DLSubmitPermission are encoded as strings, according
   to the following BNF:

     <dlsubmit-perm> ::= <dlgroup_label> ':' <dlgroup-value>
                             | <dl-label> ':' <dl-value>

     <dlgroup-label> ::= 'group_member'

     <dlgroup-value> ::= <name>

     <name> ::= an encoded Distinguished Name

     <dl-label> ::= 'individual' | 'dl_member' | 'pattern'

     <dl-value> ::= <orname>

     <orname> ::= <address> '#' <dn>
            |  <address>

     <address> ::= <add-label> ':' <oraddress>

     <dn> ::= <dn-label> ':' <name>

     <add-label> = 'X400'

     <dn-label> = 'X500'

   where <oraddress> is as defined in RFC 1327.

2.35.  Photo

   Values of type Photo are encoded as if they were octet strings
   containing JPEG images in the JPEG File Interchange Format (JFIF), as
   described in [8].

2.36.  Fax

   Values of type Fax are encoded as if they were octet strings
   containing Group 3 Fax images as defined in [7].










Howes, Kille, Yeong & Robbins                                  [Page 10]


RFC 1778                    Syntax Encoding                   March 1995


3.  Security Considerations

   Security issues are not discussed in this memo.

4.  Acknowledgements

   Many of the attribute syntax encodings defined in this document are
   adapted from those used in the QUIPU X.500 implementation. The
   contributions of the authors of the QUIPU implementation in the
   specification of the QUIPU syntaxes [4] are gratefully acknowledged.

5.  Bibliography

   [1] The Directory: Selected Attribute Syntaxes.  CCITT,
       Recommendation X.520.

   [2] Information Processing Systems -- Open Systems Interconnection --
       The Directory: Selected Attribute Syntaxes.

   [3] Barker, P., and S. Kille, "The COSINE and Internet X.500 Schema",
       RFC 1274, University College London, November 1991.

   [4] The ISO Development Environment: User's Manual -- Volume 5:
       QUIPU.  Colin Robbins, Stephen E. Kille.

   [5] Kille, S., "A String Representation of Distinguished Names", RFC
       1779, ISODE Consortium, March 1995.

   [6] Kille, S., "A String Representation for Presentation Addresses",
       RFC 1278, University College London, November 1991.

   [7] Terminal Equipment and Protocols for Telematic Services -
       Standardization of Group 3 facsimile apparatus for document
       transmission.  CCITT, Recommendation T.4.

   [8] JPEG File Interchange Format (Version 1.02).  Eric Hamilton, C-
       Cube Microsystems, Milpitas, CA, September 1, 1992.

   [9] Yeong, W., Howes, T., and S. Kille, "Lightweight Directory Access
       Protocol", RFC 1777, Performance Systems International,
       University of Michigan, ISODE Consortium, March 1995.

  [10] Alvestrand, H., Kille, S., Miles, R., Rose, M., and S.  Thompson,
       "Mapping between X.400 and RFC-822 Message Bodies", RFC 1495,
       SINTEF DELAB, ISODE Consortium, Soft*Switch, Inc., Dover Beach
       Consulting, Inc., Soft*Switch, Inc., August 1993.





Howes, Kille, Yeong & Robbins                                  [Page 11]


RFC 1778                    Syntax Encoding                   March 1995


6.  Authors' Addresses

       Tim Howes
       University of Michigan
       ITD Research Systems
       535 W William St.
       Ann Arbor, MI 48103-4943
       USA

       Phone: +1 313 747-4454
       EMail: tim@umich.edu


       Steve Kille
       ISODE Consortium
       PO Box 505
       London
       SW11 1DX
       UK

       Phone: +44-71-223-4062
       EMail: S.Kille@isode.com


       Wengyik Yeong
       PSI Inc.
       510 Huntmar Park Drive
       Herndon, VA 22070
       USA

       Phone: +1 703-450-8001
       EMail: yeongw@psilink.com


       Colin Robbins
       NeXor Ltd
       University Park
       Nottingham
       NG7 2RD
       UK











Howes, Kille, Yeong & Robbins                                  [Page 12]